|
Horner: Vettel mistake shows ‘learning curve’Comments Off The drive-through penalty that cost Sebastian Vettel victory in Hungary shows he still has much to learn. Vettel vented his anger by gesticulating from the cockpit whilst serving the penalty, and while driving into parc ferme after the race hit the marker board with his front wing. The German was penalised for falling too far behind the safety car at the restart, and while waiting to go onto the podium pleaded with FIA officials that his mistake had been “not intentional”. “Somewhere in the first stint I lost the radio connection. (And) I didn’t see the lights (on the safety car go out),” he explained. “Also Mark (Webber) — usually the leader when he does the re-start tries to drop back and then dictates the pace,” added Vettel. Boss Horner responded: “It’s premature to blame the radio for this one. He’s obviously frustrated after today but it’s part of a learning curve and there’s seven races to go.” Former Super Aguri driver and now BBC radio commentator Anthony Davidson blamed both Vettel and his team. “He clearly didn’t know about the safety car rule but it’s the team’s job to make sure the driver knows the rules,” said the Briton. Bild newspaper described the mistake as “damlich” (stupid). |
|
Safety car rules tweaked after Ferrari furoreComments Off F1′s safety car rules have been tweaked in the wake of the Valencia controversy. The 12 teams met at Silverstone ahead of the British grand prix to discuss the incidents that so enraged Ferrari and its supporters. The rule tweak, agreed between the teams and race director Charlie Whiting, addresses Ferrari’s complaint that Fernando Alonso was disadvantaged by following the rules and not overtaking the safety car on the Spanish street circuit. McLaren’s Lewis Hamilton, meanwhile, received a drive-through penalty for overtaking the safety car that was applied so late he was still able to finish the race in second place. The result of the Silverstone meeting is that the safety car rules remain effectively the same, despite some pressure to see the pits closed when the safety car is circulating. Instead, it has been agreed that drivers who are not being slowed by the safety car will have to drive on track at the same speed as the Bernd Maylander-driven Mercedes gullwing. Previously, drivers not being immediately slowed by the safety car during the safety car period only had to keep within 120 per cent of a flying laptime. In Valencia, the rule tweak would have meant Hamilton would not only have been penalised for overtaking the safety car, but also not able to negate the drive-through by driving around the track any faster than Maylander. In the meeting, Whiting also promised the teams that efforts will be made to issue penalties like Hamilton’s faster in the future. In Valencia, Hamilton’s penalty was delayed because the race director did not request the steward investigation until after the Mark Webber crash was dealt with. But in future, potential penalties will be passed immediately to the attention of the stewards, while the race director can continue to focus on a Webber-like incident. Moreover, because the arrival of crucial evidence about the Hamilton incident also slowed down the in-race investigation, there will now be cameras constantly monitoring the safety car lines 1 and 2. There will also be trackside markings that show the location of the safety car lines, so that a driver cannot argue he did not notice the lines from his driving position. |
![]() |
McLaren urges against safety car rule changesComments Off Jul.7 (GMM) McLaren has urged formula one against making a knee-jerk reaction to the safety car rules. Although Ferrari cried foul after Lewis Hamilton’s drive-through penalty in Valencia – where multiple drivers were also penalised for transgressions – Mark Webber said this week that Red Bull saw the events of the race as “normal”. And although the Sporting Working Group is looking at the rules as a response to the Ferrari-powered controversy, McLaren managing director Jonathan Neale said on Wednesday: “I would be wary of knee-jerking. “There wasn’t a lot wrong with last weekend (Valencia) and I don’t think we should be doing instant rule-making,” he told reporters during a teleconference. Meanwhile, after Williams said it will test a blown rear exhaust for its car early this weekend, Neale confirmed that a similar approach will be taken by McLaren at Silverstone. “If the drivers think it’s good it will stay on and we’ll run it,” he said, after the upgrade for the MP4-25 was tested during a straightline session. “If not, we’ll continue to develop it.” Neale also backed Red Bull boss Christian Horner’s view that the effect of the exhaust concept has been overstated. “I would tend to agree that it’s not a case of bolt on your blown diffuser and then blow everybody into the weeds,” he said. |
|
FIA officials ‘angered’ by Ferrari outburstsComments Off FIA officials may be considering action against Ferrari in the wake of the Italian team’s post-Valencia outbursts. Earlier on Monday, it appeared the governing body would not respond, after Fernando Alonso accused stewards of manipulating the race, and other Ferrari figures were similarly outspoken. The famous team’s figures are angry about the mere drive-through penalty imposed on Lewis Hamilton for overtaking the safety car, allowing the McLaren driver to finish second in the race while Alonso was just ninth. But in the past, especially in the reign of Max Mosley, the subsequent cries of foul might have met with a sanction, but sources indicated that the FIA is not considering disciplinary action against Ferrari or Alonso. However, the Guardian then reported that “a number” of FIA officials are indeed “known to be angered” by the Ferrari outbursts. Undeterred, Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo joined the dissenting chorus on Monday, insisting the outcome of the race was “misrepresentative”, and the events “very serious and unacceptable”. Red Bull team boss Christian Horner commented: “I don’t think it was manipulated. The FIA just need to look at the safety car rules in the future.” |
|
Piero Ferrari also strongly criticizesComments Off The controversial events surrounding the current safety car period at the European Grand Prix in Valencia at Ferrari make for great excitement. For Lewis Hamilton and Fernando Alonso drove directly behind the other, as Hamilton was violating the safety car rule, but afterwards he gave his improper behavior, the much better result. For while Alonso bravely behind the safety car was and as accurately as team-mate Felipe Massa was passed back when he had to come in the next round to the pits, could Hamilton up a lead that was enough, even after the pit stop to stay in second. When he came back after his drive-through in second place on the box, you felt at Ferrari naturally treated unfairly. “I am incredulous and bitter, not only for Ferrari, but for the sport as a whole, because this is not something you would expect of professionals,” criticized the son of the legendary company founder Enzo Ferraris. “I have been following now for a long time trials in several U.S. Championships, where the safety car is used very often, but there I have never seen anything like what is now happening on the course in Valencia.” The fact is that Hamilton, who has violated the rules was punished by the conditions less harsh than Alonso, whose conduct was entirely legal. It comes naturally to discussions on the current Safety Car rules. Ferrari, it also considers it “more than appropriate” to speak about the circumstances that have now led to a “wrong race.” An official complaint with the FIA has already deposited the team. |
|
Domenicali: “We are very angry”Comments Off The press round of Stefano Domenicali after the race began in Valencia because of the late decision of the stewards was later than usual, but very rewarding. For Ferrari had just made the website a controversial review online, in which the Grand Prix of Europe as a “scandal” was called. Q: Can you explain why you are so angry today? ” “The frustration is so great because we made the right move, but still less points than in the most difficult race of the year. This is very frustrating. Do I have to say from the sporting angle that we had bad luck today. The only four cars on the home straight were when the safety car was on, were Vettel, Hamilton, Fernando and Felipe. Vettel stopped before the safety car, Hamilton had ignored the yellow flags and the yellow light, but we had a full lap behind the Safety- Car driving. In the meantime, took the field that was in the pits, back on us, so we fell behind when we came into the pits. The plan you can not. ” “Before some decisions are made, you should be sure they are right and wrong. If we now know, however, that the date of a decision affects the race, then they must be taken quickly, otherwise the consequences of unfair have. Today, the Ferrari has affected quite badly, so we must make sure that something like this happen again. More I would say not really. also ran against a lot of cars still an investigation. That I think is not good. ” Question is: “When the FIA driver got into the race management – today it was Heinz-Harald Frentzen – first of all were happy, but in the last race there were many contentious decisions. How do you comment that?” Q: If the safety car not normally catch the leaders and all others to pass through? ” Q: You just said something about the big speed difference and that is dangerous. If the by the adjustable rear wing does not get worse? ” Q: Just to clarify again: On your website is a scandal of the speech. If you say that this is not the Ferrari’s opinion? ” Q: No. But it is on the Ferrari website. ” Q: Fernando, says the race was manipulated. ” Q: Will you bring this matter to the FIA or discuss with the teams? ” Q: What does this mean? Could it even be a different race result? Q: one hand, you walk the day of shooting on a very fine line when it comes to the limits of the rules to explore the other hand, the rules today against you … ” Q: Let’s auspicious on a topic. Pat Fry moves from McLaren to you. Can you describe his area of responsibility? Q: Do you find it okay that the drivers who have violated the safety car rule were punished only with five seconds? ” |
|
Schumi saind Alonso was racing on last MonacoComments Off Michael Schumacher admits he does not believe Fernando Alonso when the Spaniard says he knew overtaking was not allowed at the last corner of the recent Monaco grand prix. Due to the safety car rules confusion in the wake of the recent controversy, the FIA has vowed to clear up the regulations. But when asked in Turkey if he still thinks Schumacher should have been demoted out of the points for the pass in Monaco, Alonso said: “Yes. “Because it’s in the rules. For me it’s clear. When the safety car is on the last lap it’s not possible to overtake.” But former Ferrari driver Schumacher, who now drives for Mercedes, suggested in Istanbul that Alonso might not be telling the truth. “He almost hit the wall in attempting to defend his position!” the German is quoted as saying by Auto Hebdo. |
|
FIA to amend last-lap safety car rulesComments Off F1′s governing body on Thursday admitted a “lack of clarity” in the rules led to the last-lap Monaco controversy. When the safety car returned to the pits on the final lap of Sunday’s famous street race, Michael Schumacher passed Fernando Alonso and was subsequently handed a 20-second penalty by the stewards. Mercedes vowed to appeal the decision but ultimately decided not to proceed, with the FIA now admitting the incident “showed a lack of clarity in the application of the rule prohibiting overtaking behind the safety car”. “Adjustments to the regulations are necessary”, the Paris body explained in a statement. The problem of the flashing green lights and waving of green flags is also to be addressed, with the FIA vowing to ensure “that the signalling for teams and drivers is made more clear”. (GMM) |
Contacts and information
|
Social networks |
Most popular categories |